Tag: Conspiracy theories

  • Black Women Do Not Owe You Proof of Their Womanhood

    Black Women Do Not Owe You Proof of Their Womanhood

    I have absolutely no respect for people who spread the racist and transphobic conspiracy theory that Michelle Obama was born male.

    None.

    This lie has been debunked repeatedly, yet people keep recycling it as though repetition will turn it into evidence. Michelle Obama was born Michelle LaVaughn Robinson. There is no credible evidence for the claim that she was born “Michael” or assigned male at birth.

    A picture of Michelle Obama as a baby being held by her mother, Marian Robinson.
    A picture of Michelle Obama as a baby.

    But this is about more than one lie about one woman.

    It is about the willingness to treat Black women’s bodies, voices, and appearance as public property. Apparently, anyone with an internet connection gets to inspect them and decide whether they qualify as women.

    And some Black men participate in this bullshit when they should know better.

    A photo of Brittney Griner.
    There are few better examples of Black women’s sex and gender being questioned than Brittney Griner. Griner is the subject of some very ugly conspiracy theories and assumptions. Griner is tall, has a deep voice, has no pronounced breasts, and doesn’t conform to traditional gender roles. And all of those things are ok and don’t take away from her womanhood.

    Black women get called “masculine” for being tall, strong, outspoken, athletic, angry, or unwilling to make themselves small. A deeper voice becomes suspicious. Short hair becomes suspicious. Muscles become suspicious.

    Even confidence becomes suspicious.

    Women of other races can possess those same characteristics, but Black women are too often treated as though they have violated some rule of womanhood by possessing them.

    Who made that rule? And why are we helping enforce it?

    A picture of the Williams Sisters.
    Venus and Serena Williams were attacked for their appearance, their athleticism, and their muscular build.

    Think about the scrutiny directed at Venus and Serena Williams. Think about Brittney Griner and Grace Jones. Think about how quickly people turn a Black woman’s strength, stature, or appearance into an accusation.

    The details of each woman’s experience differ. But the impulse to inspect, mock, and police Black women’s bodies is familiar as hell.

    I hear echoes of Malcolm X’s criticism of the disrespect and lack of protection Black women face. Decades later, we are still watching people turn that disrespect into entertainment.

    And the supposed defense of Michelle Obama sometimes falls into the same trap.

    People point to her children, her marriage, her clothes, or how feminine she looks, as though the right combination of evidence will finally satisfy the people attacking her.

    We should challenge the lie. But we should also challenge the premise.

    A woman does not have to give birth, wear dresses, have a particular body shape, or meet somebody’s beauty standard to deserve respect.

    A small collage of pictures of Michelle Obama as a young lady.
    Picture of Michelle Obama throughout her young years.

    Michelle Obama does not need an exception made for her height or her facial features. There is nothing about those things that needs explaining away.

    Nor should defending her require treating transgender women as an insult she must be separated from. The conspiracy is false, and its use of trans identity as a weapon is part of what makes it ugly.

    Being transgender is not a disgrace. Lying about someone’s identity to humiliate them is disgraceful.

    The people spreading this story often try to demean Barack Obama at the same time. In their telling, supposedly exposing his wife would somehow diminish his manhood.

    That tells us something about the prejudices doing the work here. Black womanhood becomes something to ridicule. Black manhood becomes something to undermine. Transgender identity becomes something to sneer at.

    And the whole thing gets passed around as a joke.

    A photo of Isis King.
    Isis King is a trans woman who is an actress and a model. One doesn’t have to be born anatomically female to be feminine.

    What, exactly, is funny?

    The contempt for Black women? The attempt to humiliate a Black family? The idea that somebody’s gender can be determined by studying a photograph and making shit up?

    I do not find any of that clever.

    You do not have to like Michelle Obama. You do not have to agree with her politics, admire her speeches, buy her books, or defend her husband’s administration.

    There are legitimate things to discuss and criticize.

    But disagreement does not entitle you to invent a different identity for her or subject her body to some imaginary gender inspection.

    And being Black does not make participation in that harassment less anti-Black.

    If you are a Black man spreading this lie, ask yourself why you are so eager to help people degrade a Black woman. Ask yourself whose approval you are seeking and what, exactly, you think our community gains from your participation.

    The same goes for Black women who join in. Familiarity with this kind of scrutiny should give us more reason to reject it.

    A photo of the Robinson family when Michelle Obama was a little girl.
    Michelle Obama as a child with her brother and her parents.

    I am not going to insult somebody’s mother, grandmother, or partner to make that point. Those women do not deserve to have their appearance dragged into this either.

    That is the whole damn problem: too many people think a woman’s appearance is fair game whenever they want to win an argument.

    It needs to stop.

    Black women do not owe you a particular kind of femininity. They do not owe you access to their private lives. And they do not owe you proof that they are women.

    Criticize what Michelle Obama actually says and does if you have an argument to make.

    But stop spreading this racist, transphobic bullshit and pretending it is political commentary.

  • Nation-Building Requires Reality, Not Conspiracy Theories

    Nation-Building Requires Reality, Not Conspiracy Theories

    One of the biggest mistakes I see in some corners of the Black community is the tendency to give white people far too much credit.

    White people are not omniscient.

    They are not omnipotent.

    They do not spend centuries carrying out flawless master plans that unfold exactly as intended. History simply doesn’t support that view.

    Most governments, corporations, and powerful institutions don’t operate like the cartoonish villains in a Hollywood movie. Their conspiracies (when they exist) are usually messy, short-sighted, reactive, and often exposed much sooner than people imagine. They make mistakes. They fight among themselves. They pursue immediate political or economic gains without fully understanding the long-term consequences of their decisions.

    History is full of examples where powerful people achieved one objective only to create entirely new problems they never anticipated.

    That doesn’t make oppression any less real. I am certainly not arguing that. Rather, it simply makes the oppressors more human.

    Unfortunately, some people have embraced a worldview where every historical event is interpreted as evidence of an elaborate, centuries-long conspiracy that only a handful of self-proclaimed “enlightened” YouTubers can supposedly decode.

    I don’t buy it.

    Ironically, this kind of thinking can become a form of white supremacy itself.

    Why?

    Because it assumes that Europeans and their descendants possess almost supernatural intelligence and foresight, and that every outcome in history happened exactly as they intended. It turns them into all-knowing masterminds while reducing everyone else to passive spectators with no agency of their own.

    History is far more complicated than that. Empires rise, and empires fall. Wars produce unintended consequences. Economic systems evolve. And, technology changes societies in unexpected ways.

    Entire civilizations have been transformed by accidents, disease, environmental changes, and decisions that looked reasonable at the time but produced completely unforeseen results.

    The world we live in today wasn’t built from one perfect blueprint. Instead, it emerged from countless successes, failures, conflicts, compromises, and historical accidents.

    The same applies to European dominance.

    Europeans didn’t become globally dominant because they were biologically smarter than everyone else. Wealth, geography, trade networks, military competition, access to resources, political institutions, and centuries of technological development all contributed to that outcome. And let’s not forget the unfortunate accidental “luck” of wiping out most of the people on two continents with new diseases. The Innovation tends to flourish where societies have the resources, security, and incentives to pursue it.

    More importantly, what we choose to believe affects what we choose to do.

    If we convince ourselves that every aspect of our current reality was perfectly engineered hundreds of years ago, we risk believing that nothing can be changed. This fatalism has never liberated anyone and saps people of any real empowerment.

    This is one reason I have little patience for theories claiming that the countless slave ledgers documenting the forced transportation of Africans across the Atlantic are all fabricated because “they” supposedly want us to believe we’re Africans instead of Native Americans or ancient Israelites.

    The historical evidence overwhelmingly points to the fact that Black Americans are primarily descendants of West and West-Central Africans. Accepting that reality doesn’t diminish us. It does the opposite. It connects us to one of the richest, oldest, and most diverse regions in human history.

    Instead of spending our energy chasing increasingly elaborate conspiracy theories, we should be asking far more practical questions:

    How do we build stronger Black-owned businesses?

    How do we create institutions that outlive us?

    How do we increase homeownership?

    How do we educate our children about African and African American history?

    How do we develop economic relationships with countries throughout Africa and the wider African diaspora?

    How do we build wealth instead of merely talking about it?

    These questions are much more important than hanging on to weird conspiracy theories.

    Nation-building is harder than conspiracy-building. It requires discipline instead of speculation, investment instead of internet debates, and cooperation instead of division.

    If we truly want liberation, then our greatest challenge isn’t uncovering another secret plot.

    Our greatest challenge is building communities that are economically independent, culturally confident, politically organized, and connected to the broader African world.

    That’s work worth doing. Everything else is just a distraction.