Tag: transphobia

  • Black Women Do Not Owe You Proof of Their Womanhood

    Black Women Do Not Owe You Proof of Their Womanhood

    I have absolutely no respect for people who spread the racist and transphobic conspiracy theory that Michelle Obama was born male.

    None.

    This lie has been debunked repeatedly, yet people keep recycling it as though repetition will turn it into evidence. Michelle Obama was born Michelle LaVaughn Robinson. There is no credible evidence for the claim that she was born “Michael” or assigned male at birth.

    A picture of Michelle Obama as a baby being held by her mother, Marian Robinson.
    A picture of Michelle Obama as a baby.

    But this is about more than one lie about one woman.

    It is about the willingness to treat Black women’s bodies, voices, and appearance as public property. Apparently, anyone with an internet connection gets to inspect them and decide whether they qualify as women.

    And some Black men participate in this bullshit when they should know better.

    A photo of Brittney Griner.
    There are few better examples of Black women’s sex and gender being questioned than Brittney Griner. Griner is the subject of some very ugly conspiracy theories and assumptions. Griner is tall, has a deep voice, has no pronounced breasts, and doesn’t conform to traditional gender roles. And all of those things are ok and don’t take away from her womanhood.

    Black women get called “masculine” for being tall, strong, outspoken, athletic, angry, or unwilling to make themselves small. A deeper voice becomes suspicious. Short hair becomes suspicious. Muscles become suspicious.

    Even confidence becomes suspicious.

    Women of other races can possess those same characteristics, but Black women are too often treated as though they have violated some rule of womanhood by possessing them.

    Who made that rule? And why are we helping enforce it?

    A picture of the Williams Sisters.
    Venus and Serena Williams were attacked for their appearance, their athleticism, and their muscular build.

    Think about the scrutiny directed at Venus and Serena Williams. Think about Brittney Griner and Grace Jones. Think about how quickly people turn a Black woman’s strength, stature, or appearance into an accusation.

    The details of each woman’s experience differ. But the impulse to inspect, mock, and police Black women’s bodies is familiar as hell.

    I hear echoes of Malcolm X’s criticism of the disrespect and lack of protection Black women face. Decades later, we are still watching people turn that disrespect into entertainment.

    And the supposed defense of Michelle Obama sometimes falls into the same trap.

    People point to her children, her marriage, her clothes, or how feminine she looks, as though the right combination of evidence will finally satisfy the people attacking her.

    We should challenge the lie. But we should also challenge the premise.

    A woman does not have to give birth, wear dresses, have a particular body shape, or meet somebody’s beauty standard to deserve respect.

    A small collage of pictures of Michelle Obama as a young lady.
    Picture of Michelle Obama throughout her young years.

    Michelle Obama does not need an exception made for her height or her facial features. There is nothing about those things that needs explaining away.

    Nor should defending her require treating transgender women as an insult she must be separated from. The conspiracy is false, and its use of trans identity as a weapon is part of what makes it ugly.

    Being transgender is not a disgrace. Lying about someone’s identity to humiliate them is disgraceful.

    The people spreading this story often try to demean Barack Obama at the same time. In their telling, supposedly exposing his wife would somehow diminish his manhood.

    That tells us something about the prejudices doing the work here. Black womanhood becomes something to ridicule. Black manhood becomes something to undermine. Transgender identity becomes something to sneer at.

    And the whole thing gets passed around as a joke.

    A photo of Isis King.
    Isis King is a trans woman who is an actress and a model. One doesn’t have to be born anatomically female to be feminine.

    What, exactly, is funny?

    The contempt for Black women? The attempt to humiliate a Black family? The idea that somebody’s gender can be determined by studying a photograph and making shit up?

    I do not find any of that clever.

    You do not have to like Michelle Obama. You do not have to agree with her politics, admire her speeches, buy her books, or defend her husband’s administration.

    There are legitimate things to discuss and criticize.

    But disagreement does not entitle you to invent a different identity for her or subject her body to some imaginary gender inspection.

    And being Black does not make participation in that harassment less anti-Black.

    If you are a Black man spreading this lie, ask yourself why you are so eager to help people degrade a Black woman. Ask yourself whose approval you are seeking and what, exactly, you think our community gains from your participation.

    The same goes for Black women who join in. Familiarity with this kind of scrutiny should give us more reason to reject it.

    A photo of the Robinson family when Michelle Obama was a little girl.
    Michelle Obama as a child with her brother and her parents.

    I am not going to insult somebody’s mother, grandmother, or partner to make that point. Those women do not deserve to have their appearance dragged into this either.

    That is the whole damn problem: too many people think a woman’s appearance is fair game whenever they want to win an argument.

    It needs to stop.

    Black women do not owe you a particular kind of femininity. They do not owe you access to their private lives. And they do not owe you proof that they are women.

    Criticize what Michelle Obama actually says and does if you have an argument to make.

    But stop spreading this racist, transphobic bullshit and pretending it is political commentary.

  • Moral Panics, “Groomer” Accusations, and a Familiar Pattern

    Moral Panics, “Groomer” Accusations, and a Familiar Pattern

    When conservatives are asked to provide empirical evidence of a connection between the LGBTQIA community and pedophilia, the response is rarely data.

    Instead, what usually appears are viral clips taken out of context, screenshots circulated by accounts like Libs of TikTok, isolated drag performances from other countries, sermons from openly hostile churches, anecdotes repeated on podcasts, or emotionally charged testimony from activists at school board meetings.

    What rarely appears are numbers, peer-reviewed studies, or credible statistical research demonstrating a meaningful relationship between LGBTQIA identity and child predation.

    This is not accidental.

    The current panic surrounding “groomers” follows a pattern that has appeared repeatedly throughout history. Moral panics often rely on emotionally powerful accusations that frame a targeted group as a threat to children or social order. Once that framing takes hold, evidence becomes secondary to fear.

    In many cases, the people promoting these accusations present themselves as defenders of vulnerable children. Yet it is often the same political actors who oppose policies that materially support children, such as expanded healthcare, education funding, or protections against abuse.

    That contradiction should raise questions.

    For Black Americans in particular, this rhetoric has an unsettling historical echo. Throughout the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Black men were routinely portrayed as sexual predators who threatened white women. These accusations were rarely supported by evidence, but they were politically powerful. They were used to justify segregation, mass incarceration, racial terror, and the destruction of entire Black communities.

    The narrative did not have to be true. It only had to be believed.

    The same mechanism is visible today. By portraying LGBTQIA people as inherently predatory, political movements can frame discrimination as protection. Policies restricting LGBTQIA rights are then presented not as acts of exclusion, but as necessary defenses of children.

    This strategy is not new.

    In the early twentieth century, the Ku Klux Klan expanded its influence by presenting itself as a protector of “American values,” white womanhood, and Christian civilization. Films like The Birth of a Nation helped transform the Klan’s image from that of a small terrorist organization in the South into a supposed guardian of social order.

    History shows how dangerous that type of narrative can become.

    None of this means that abuse never occurs in any community. Sexual abuse exists across every demographic group and social category. But addressing it responsibly requires evidence, data, and careful investigation—not broad accusations aimed at entire populations.

    When accusations replace evidence, the goal is rarely child protection. More often, the goal is political mobilization.

    Moral panics have always worked that way.